The Lowdown on Robo-Advisors
The trend toward online investing and advisory services, also known as robo-investing and robo-advice is gaining momentum, but industry participants are struggling to get a handle on how retail investors view and/or use robo-services to conduct their financial affairs.
Studies Abound
Recent research conducted by major asset management firms has gleaned insight, yet often their findings turn up contradictory information. For instance, one study conducted by State Street Center for Applied Research found that 65% of retail investors believe that technology will do a better job at meeting their needs than human advisors.1 Other research conducted by Allianz Life®, which focused on generational approaches to investing and managing finances, revealed more complex attitudes.
Case in point: When baby boomers and Generation Xers were asked about using robo-advisors, a significant majority (69%) from both demographic groups said they “don’t really trust online advice.” Further, 76% opined that “there is so much selling online that it’s hard to trust the financial advice.”2
The same study revealed that while more than a third of respondents expressed some interest in working with a robo-advisor, just one in 10 would be comfortable having a relationship with an advisor that existed solely online.2
Yet as technology evolves and financial information proliferates online, investors are spending more time on financial websites, with 40% saying they visit such sites regularly, 13% go to financial sites daily, and 22% do some trading online. Among this group there appears to be a growing comfort level with the robo-experience, as 42% stated that “there’s nothing a financial advisor can tell me that I can’t find out online.”2
A Push-Pull Message
Indeed, study after study on the emerging impact of digital advice is finding widespread ambivalence on the part of investors. On one hand, they are increasingly comfortable with getting their financial information and conducting more business through digital channels, while on the other, they still gravitate toward human relationships when dealing with complex “big picture” planning issues such as meeting their income needs in retirement and setting and managing other long-term financial goals.
Still in its infancy, the world of Web-based financial services will no doubt evolve and present exciting new developments in the future.
This communication is not intended to be investment advice and should not be treated as such. Each individual’s situation is different. You should contact your financial professional to discuss your personal situation.
Source/Disclaimer:
1financial-planning.com, “Can Advisors Rebuff Challenge of Automated Investing?” February 25, 2016.
2Allianz Life®, ‘ “Robo” Financial Advising on the Rise, But Gen Xers and Boomers Still Prefer the Human Touch,’ February 16, 2016.
Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error by Wealth Management Systems Inc. or its sources, neither Wealth Management Systems Inc. nor its sources guarantees the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or availability of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. In no event shall Wealth Management Systems Inc. be liable for any indirect, special or consequential damages in connection with subscriber’s or others’ use of the content.
© 2016 DST Systems, Inc. Reproduction in whole or in part prohibited, except by permission. All rights reserved. Not responsible for any errors or omissions.
Post by Phil Ratcliff
Phil Ratcliff, President of rebel Financial, is a senior financial advisor that holds an AIF®, CFP®, ChFC®, and CLU® certifications. He started his career at American Express Financial Advisors in 2003, then moved to AXA Advisors for 7 years before founding rebel Financial LLC in 2013.
